|
Post by blackisthecolor on Mar 25, 2016 18:24:59 GMT
those are from yesterday's other posts.
|
|
|
Post by bastilabey on Mar 25, 2016 18:34:14 GMT
I know it's been said before, but I'm just now beginning to realize how many lurkers there are on that thread. Over 10000 views and it's only been created yesterday! By comparison the photo threat only has 12000 and it's been around for a month and Finnrey thread has near to 20000 and it's been there for nearly two weeks! I wonder if by now Reylo has surpassed the stormpilot by the number of followers. I myself was a longtime lurker before finally getting the nerve to post! Reylo seems like something that people might subconsciously pick up on in their first viewing but then it takes time to absorb and decide whether you feel ok with it. And lots of people pick up on a one sided attraction from Ren but still feel it's 'too creepy' to become a real plot point. I hope more people continue to read the metas and realize the potential of such a storyline within the SW universe. It's also likely that most of the GA have never heard of Bastila and Revan so are unaware of the existing precedent of darkside/lightside romance and force bonds.
|
|
|
Post by iseeanisland on Mar 25, 2016 18:40:26 GMT
Here's a notion I kept seeing pop up in that theforce.net thread that I find irritating: Rey can't have a romance with the bad guy because *gasp* think of the children! *Gasp* What will I tell my daughter who is looking up to her? So two points here: A. There are many examples of male heroes who have sexual/romantic subplot with female villains in comics and there is not a complaint when this gender dynamic is in play. B. I have a daughter. You know what I'm going to tell her? In real life honey, bad boys are for fun only. There, problem solved. Right? I have a daughter, and I'm not worried about the long-term impact that Reylo might have on her. If we need to, we'll have a talk about "bad boys" at some point.
|
|
|
Post by frared on Mar 25, 2016 18:40:38 GMT
i saw a comment that said something like, oh but kylo did nothing wrong! he's so adorbz! ... which i assume is about my avatar? Nah, Chorus was making a lighthearted remark in response to my argument that people forgive Han all his crimes because he's good looking, just like people are saying we're forgiving Kylo his because he's good looking. It was not intended to be trolling, it was a gentle ribbing. yeah i think he's baiting. i don't trust them. either way i just wrote to the head admin asking for some clarification on mods baiting and neutrality and asking why the thread was locked and all that.
|
|
|
Post by reynak on Mar 25, 2016 18:57:26 GMT
I wonder why they have to post anything. On other boards mods don't interfere at all and that's much better,unless they are forums like this one,where everyone feels comfortable with the rest. In fact, when I see their avatars I feel uneasy,they make me feel uncomfortable.
I feel like going there and post:
I forgive whoever I want.
|
|
|
Post by iseeanisland on Mar 25, 2016 19:00:12 GMT
I wonder why they have to post anything. On other boards mods don't interfere at all and that's much better,unless they are forums like this one,where everyone feels comfortable with the rest. In fact, when I see their avatars I feel uneasy,they make me feel uncomfortable. Agreed. Usually (on other boards), mods cut waaaaay back on their posting when they become mods. They might step in to issue gentle reminders or mediate heated arguments, but they don't typically post their opinions like a typical poster.
|
|
|
Post by spacebaby on Mar 25, 2016 19:07:40 GMT
I wonder why they have to post anything. On other boards mods don't interfere at all and that's much better,unless they are forums like this one,where everyone feels comfortable with the rest. In fact, when I see their avatars I feel uneasy,they make me feel uncomfortable. I feel like going there and post: I forgive whoever I want.This^^^^^^^^ So super tired of the moral police, when in ever single person can me a relativist for whatever or whomever side they are on.
|
|
|
Post by solosidecousin on Mar 25, 2016 19:09:31 GMT
I know... But I guess the best thing is to ignore snarky comments. I agree mods should lead by example, but whatever, they are human. But you know what? I'm actually thinking a new thread is a good idea! The discussion is circular anyways. Old themes will be picked up. In the old thread, the first 50 to 100 pages or so were just meant to establish that yes, there were romantic undertones and tones, and yes, the potential for a romantic arc is totally there! Ok, it was fun, a lot of collective brainstorming, I think it influenced opinions. People changed their minds from trash ship to real possibility. The new thread starts from a different point of view, that some kind of romantic arc IS possible. And of course it is. I actually even like the "rules", even if I don't necessarily agree with some of the self proclaimed rules, I think the need to order is good. I don't know, I have only good things to say about Mavjade, Valairy Sctott, and even EHT. I think perhaps we should not be bitter. The only other solution I think would be to have a fan thread in the community for social and silly stuff. i'm sorry i think the thread was wonderful because it allowed us a sense of community when apparently elsewhere on the webs there is a lot of hostility. if they wanted different rules, they could have just tagged it on to the first post and alerted us and not shut the thread down. i'm especially especially dismayed about the whole no fanart thing. like that hurts people and clogs up the thread. what the fuck? who cares? who really cares? the only way i understand it is that the thread was becoming too big, like it moved too fast and this is a way of cutting down traffic and making it more mod-able. i really don't care, i loved its chaotic nature and i feel bereft. it was a good place and i don't think i'm alone with that. now we are scattered and the good stuff that happened i will miss because of where everyone is. i asked whether we could be involved in the process of the reorganisation and was told no. well, apparently FFG could be. interesting no? i think that is a very weird way of doing things. AND: the hostility elsewhere is very unlike the board that i used to frequent. now i feel like my specific opinion is targeted. i agree that our discussion is circular, fine, but that's the nature of the beast, that's not going to go away in the new thread either. you know, it's like they repossessed our home and now all we've got is ikea furniture pot noodle. They told you that you couldn't be involved?!!!!!!! I don't understand that. You've been on the board for a while. I also absolutely hear you on everything else. I am very glad we have this board, but everyone is scattered and Mr. Dick Chorus is hovering like a freakin vulture! Yeah, and reeducation is the word. Maybe they can get their Little Red Book out while they're at it, the one with the chapter that says "Troglodyte Men and Shamer Women Tell Individual and Empowered and Diverse Women and Men How To Think Appropriately." Ugh!
|
|
|
Post by solosidecousin on Mar 25, 2016 19:13:24 GMT
Actually, I was on the forum for the pre TFA speculation, and there were a lot of women. I'd guess half and half, but perhaps it was mu own bias and the threads I stuck to. Hi, guys! That's exactly what is happening. SW's fandoms, like so many other fandoms on the Internet, used to be a sort of haven for the ultimate geeky dudebros, so when other sorts of fans started swarming their sanctuary, they got annoyed first, and then really pissed. Not all guys are like that, thanks God, but there are far too many in fandom. In other fandoms they treated female fans exactly the same way or even worse. They also ridicule Tumblr saying it is just for crazy fangirls. But they are wrong, there's a bit of everything on Tumlbr, including very insightful meta. And anyway, what happens if people want to fangirl? The are entitled to doing whatever they want, as long as they respect others. These guys don't want to educate us, they just want to drive us out, or disperse us, so that our voices get diluted in other threads. As someone has said some posts before, guys may like whatever they like, anything, whereas those girls who like Twilight or 50 Shades of Grey are demonized, or worse, looked down on or made fun of. Well, I haven't read 50 Shades or have seen or read Twilight myself. They are not my cup of tea and I think they are poor quality, forgive me if any of you are fans, but this is how I see them. However, I would never shame anyone or make fun of anyone who likes them. Who am I to tell anybody what they should like? And what about this moralistic nonsense telling us what kind of male fictional characters we should like? What's that? That's paternalistic and disrespectful. I don't need any guy telling me what's better for me, thank you very much. And I can distinguish fiction from reality perfectly well, as all of us here and there on the thread. In the old days, when women weren't even allowed to vote, it was believed that women shouldn't read too much because their minds were weak and couldn't tell the difference between fiction and reality. Well, it seems we haven't advanced enough in this respect. The central idea is always the same, control, trying to control women. And controlling our imaginations is the ultimate goal. So, girls, you have to choose a NICE guy, which means one dudebros can identify with, because if you choose a different type of guy,and in this case a really sexy one, you can be sure he must be bad for you. Sexy guys are all bad, it is known! While a nice guy you don't feel attracted too is exactly what you need, yeah! That's the receipt for a happy life together, choose someone you have 0 chemistry with. And who is nice? A guy has to decide for you, because they know better. In this case it's clear Kylo is most dangerous, he is bad news, I agree, but we expect him to come back to the right path,that's why we ship Reylo. This has nothing to do with RL and we are not thinking of sending letters to criminals in jail. And whatever we decide, it is our live and our imagination, not theirs. But they won't let us have the party in peace. Sing it sister!!! Sing it!!! So awesome!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by solosidecousin on Mar 25, 2016 19:21:49 GMT
That's certainly how it comes across to me. There seems to be an impression that Reylo shippers ship Reylo because Twilight, because 50 Shades of Grey, because "bad boys" are sexy and disturbed women like us send love letters to serial killers in prison, and nothing we do or say can change that impression. Nothing we say, none of our complex analyses, our hopes for redemption, or waxing poetic about the exciting and empowering aspects of the Reylo dynamic, etc. gets through that brick wall. I've noticed it so many times already. They don't just misunderstand our point of view; they refuse to accept it. They've categorised us as silly women who swoon over bad boys, and they don't want to consider the possibility that we might have any real point beyond that blind love for bad boys. The intelligent analysis probably drives them nuts because it flies in the face of that categorisation. I don't know where they think male Reylo shippers fit in. (Not to mention that even if the appeal of Reylo isn't dark romance, it seems odd to compare those who genuinely do enjoy dark romance to crazy women who send love letters to serial killers. To say nothing of Twilight. Yeah, the central dynamic of Twilight was a bit off in my opinion, but it was a hugely popular series for teenagers. It wasn't torture porn or anything genuinely disturbing: it was just a fantasy YA series about sparkly vampires. The moral panic about it being dangerous to young girls' imaginations is so hilarious to me.) Oddly enough, I think that a love of redemption stories (especially ones about men being redeemed) can be a safe way for women imagining that there could be forgiveness for our own flaws and sins. It's so abhorrent to culture to imagine that women can be bad, sinful, sexual, naughty, angry, and messed up that those characteristics are displaced onto a male character. The positive characteristics--the ones that it is safe for women to admit to having--are embodied in the heroine. Thus, when the bad guy is redeemed and joined with the heroine, it isn't about how women like bad guys. It's a fantasy of women accepting the dark impulses within themselves and integrating those culturally-hated aspects of their psyche with the ones we are allowed to acknowledge. That would be why most fans of redemption stories don't chase after bad boys in real life. Because it's actually not a fantasy about potential sexual and romantic partners. It's a fantasy about self-realization (in a sexy, romantic, safe package with nice hair and kissable lips). This!!! You are on fire today Reynak!!!! Other people besides us need to see your thoughts! Maybe this forum should be open, with a few closed, members-only, places. That way we can get new people and great thoughts like this can get out there without Chorus Dick smashing his big ugly fist on them!
|
|
|
Post by solosidecousin on Mar 25, 2016 19:23:20 GMT
That's certainly how it comes across to me. There seems to be an impression that Reylo shippers ship Reylo because Twilight, because 50 Shades of Grey, because "bad boys" are sexy and disturbed women like us send love letters to serial killers in prison, and nothing we do or say can change that impression. Nothing we say, none of our complex analyses, our hopes for redemption, or waxing poetic about the exciting and empowering aspects of the Reylo dynamic, etc. gets through that brick wall. I've noticed it so many times already. They don't just misunderstand our point of view; they refuse to accept it. They've categorised us as silly women who swoon over bad boys, and they don't want to consider the possibility that we might have any real point beyond that blind love for bad boys. The intelligent analysis probably drives them nuts because it flies in the face of that categorisation. I don't know where they think male Reylo shippers fit in. (Not to mention that even if the appeal of Reylo isn't dark romance, it seems odd to compare those who genuinely do enjoy dark romance to crazy women who send love letters to serial killers. To say nothing of Twilight. Yeah, the central dynamic of Twilight was a bit off in my opinion, but it was a hugely popular series for teenagers. It wasn't torture porn or anything genuinely disturbing: it was just a fantasy YA series about sparkly vampires. The moral panic about it being dangerous to young girls' imaginations is so hilarious to me.) Oddly enough, I think that a love of redemption stories (especially ones about men being redeemed) can be a safe way for women imagining that there could be forgiveness for our own flaws and sins. It's so abhorrent to culture to imagine that women can be bad, sinful, sexual, naughty, angry, and messed up that those characteristics are displaced onto a male character. The positive characteristics--the ones that it is safe for women to admit to having--are embodied in the heroine. Thus, when the bad guy is redeemed and joined with the heroine, it isn't about how women like bad guys. It's a fantasy of women accepting the dark impulses within themselves and integrating those culturally-hated aspects of their psyche with the ones we are allowed to acknowledge. That would be why most fans of redemption stories don't chase after bad boys in real life. Because it's actually not a fantasy about potential sexual and romantic partners. It's a fantasy about self-realization (in a sexy, romantic, safe package with nice hair and kissable lips). Wait!!! You're on fire too Anne!!! Same thoughts about getting the words out!!! :-)
|
|
|
Post by solosidecousin on Mar 25, 2016 19:25:33 GMT
Maybe we could index the old JCF Reylo thread (so we don't lose everything we've analysed since TFA's release) and start again in a place we could call "our own"? A place where we could keep our work safe? That's what came to my mind... I don't see myself contributing again to the 2.0 thread (as said before, enthusiasm = 0) and the idea of a Fan club on JCF doesn't really appeal to me :/ This would be absolutely amazing if this could be done. Also, my husband and I were looking at the terms of the site. It appears that tfn does not "own" our words in the same way Facebook does. How would we do it?
|
|
panki
New Member
Posts: 16
|
Post by panki on Mar 25, 2016 19:25:45 GMT
i'm sorry i think the thread was wonderful because it allowed us a sense of community when apparently elsewhere on the webs there is a lot of hostility. if they wanted different rules, they could have just tagged it on to the first post and alerted us and not shut the thread down. i'm especially especially dismayed about the whole no fanart thing. like that hurts people and clogs up the thread. what the fuck? who cares? who really cares? the only way i understand it is that the thread was becoming too big, like it moved too fast and this is a way of cutting down traffic and making it more mod-able. i really don't care, i loved its chaotic nature and i feel bereft. it was a good place and i don't think i'm alone with that. now we are scattered and the good stuff that happened i will miss because of where everyone is. i asked whether we could be involved in the process of the reorganisation and was told no. well, apparently FFG could be. interesting no? i think that is a very weird way of doing things. AND: the hostility elsewhere is very unlike the board that i used to frequent. now i feel like my specific opinion is targeted. i agree that our discussion is circular, fine, but that's the nature of the beast, that's not going to go away in the new thread either. you know, it's like they repossessed our home and now all we've got is ikea furniture pot noodle. They told you that you couldn't be involved?!!!!!!! I don't understand that. You've been on the board for a while. I also absolutely hear you on everything else. I am very glad we have this board, but everyone is scattered and Mr. Dick Chorus is hovering like a freakin vulture! Yeah, and reeducation is the word. Maybe they can get their Little Red Book out while they're at it, the one with the chapter that says "Troglodyte Men and Shamer Women Tell Individual and Empowered and Diverse Women and Men How To Think Appropriately." Ugh! Hi everybody....sorry I haven't been too active since yesterday....having a personal emergency....vulture is the term for Chorus of Disapproval.....what is his problem? Is Blastaar his boyfriend that he is picking on us for the meltdown? I've got hold of the email ID of the site owner....I'll need a day or so to write to him since I'm still dealing with some stuff and a letter like this requires some thought...nothing will probably come of it but no harm trying.
|
|
|
Post by smaaaash on Mar 25, 2016 19:28:11 GMT
So this is where all you troublemakers run off to when the Mod's are done with you? Sup beardwalker..lurking here too?
|
|
missg
New Member
Posts: 11
|
Post by missg on Mar 25, 2016 19:28:29 GMT
I know it's been said before, but I'm just now beginning to realize how many lurkers there are on that thread. Over 10000 views and it's only been created yesterday! By comparison the photo threat only has 12000 and it's been around for a month and Finnrey thread has near to 20000 and it's been there for nearly two weeks! I wonder if by now Reylo has surpassed the stormpilot by the number of followers. I myself was a longtime lurker before finally getting the nerve to post! Reylo seems like something that people might subconsciously pick up on in their first viewing but then it takes time to absorb and decide whether you feel ok with it. And lots of people pick up on a one sided attraction from Ren but still feel it's 'too creepy' to become a real plot point. I hope more people continue to read the metas and realize the potential of such a storyline within the SW universe. It's also likely that most of the GA have never heard of Bastila and Revan so are unaware of the existing precedent of darkside/lightside romance and force bonds. I agree that the potential of such storyline within SW movies might seem strange to GA, but if we go outside SW it's been quite prominent in romance/urban fantasy books circles. Even the concept of a force bond isn't that strange, I've seen it in fiction for years, even if it wasn't called "a force bond". I think many of the people who like these would notice Kylo's fixation straight away, it's not just a maybe for them, it's obvious and it doesn't matter whether it ever happened in SW before or not. Then there are those who are not sure/open minded about Reylo and those are the people who have seen something strange happening, but cannot put their finger on it, they are the ones who need the metas to see where it might be heading. The third category are people who for one reason or another just plainly refuse to see the dynamic, not even a 1000 of metas would convince them, only seeing it happening on the screen would. Reylo attracts so much attention, both positive and negative and in a way it's perfect, it means if it happens nobody would be left with a feeling of meh, it'd create a response and isn't it what the art is for? To make us feel?! I'm just making myself so excited about the idea now, if the filmmakers know what they're doing, Reylo connection could be a pure piece of art!
|
|